1857.

3rd.-The latest fourth wedding off Judge “Crown and Anchor” A good.O.F. got recognized by a supper on Sibling. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the newest settee, and it are stated that new Judge upcoming contains ninety members.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you may J. Bayly got opted the fresh new people in the general public Library Panel.

p. 207 The human body regarding a good whale, which had been pulled in the Winterton, was being presented for the Chapel Simple.

The fresh Rev. W. D. Wade, the fresh minister off St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, already been presented with a wallet out-of ?61.

21st.-The newest “Sisters” was within the crash having among the stone piers of the latest Connection, which it had most broken.

Feb. next.-An Anti-Taxation conference got held within City Hallway. This new Gran presided, plus the pursuing the took part in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer looked like the new mover inside matter.

Feb. 21st.-Good “Poor’s Speed” meeting was kept at Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and Duisburg female you may a resolution protesting against the 1s. 6d. quarterly rates try accompanied. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you will F. Starling spoke on the subject, as the make of the Guardians are defended by Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of several Panel.

Feb. 25th.-An incident and that excited big desire, was read at State Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, through to the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The brand new plaintiff is actually Mr. John Cobb, fabric merchant, to possess which Mr. C. H. Chamberlin searched; the new defendants had been Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and Grams. D. Palmer, who had been portrayed from the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The brand new plaintiff reported that he was an applicant into office out-of Councillor on elizabeth for example on solicitation of Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer. During the time he became a candidate he distinctly informed them that he won’t shell out regarding his very own pouch a great deal more than just ?ten toward expenditures of the election, and it are understood that Liberal party, to which he belonged, do sign up the others. The night till the election he acquired a price away from exactly what the expense were probably be, along with result of which he at the same time watched one another Mr. Burroughs and you can Mr. G. D. Palmer. That guess, the guy believed, amounted to regarding the ?forty-five, because the subscriptions completely amounted so you can but ?42. Just after particular talk they wanted to keep your innocuous of your own amount of the expense which may go beyond the sum of the licensed, and he and Mr. Burroughs after that ran p. 208 towards the Panel-room of one’s Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said they’d generated arrangements due to their buddy John Cobb successful industry-ward. The costs of one’s election, that he (the new plaintiff) lost, amounted altogether to ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, hence, which he today stated throughout the defendants is ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The latest plaintiff, inside the cross-examination from the Mr. Cufaude, admitted that ?39 of one’s whole amount are to have – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated that if, once the plaintiff mentioned, the fresh new defendants got given him a hope towards excess costs, brand new guarantee ought to come into writing. And you will, whenever the evidence try genuine, and that, not, he debated, it had been hopeless on the plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch when he himself had anticipate one to a large part from the full expenditures was to own – -, that has been an unlawful act.-Mr. Chamberlin argued the plaintiff, immediately following researching the promise on the defendants, acted simply on the latest faith of this pledge, hence thus, while they had registered abreast of an engagement to invest the cash, these were responsible. The cash, also, had not been spent by the plaintiff, but by panel designated so you can make brand new election, and before the election try over, the plaintiff was not conscious all currency had started spent inside – -.-Their Honor said it had been clear new ensure have to have come on paper. He was away from advice, plus, your plaintiff was not bound to pay the unlawful fees, and consequently he could perhaps not render his step for cash he advertised.-This new plaintiff is actually, correctly, non-eliminate.