In getting together with its ily Court discussed “cohabitation” because the a love existing when a few persons of contrary sex live to each other, which includes standard of continuity, like they certainly were couple

This can be an appeal of a family Courtroom purchase terminating alimony into appellant-partner pursuant to help you a stipulated contract to pay alimony unless of course this new partner cohabited that have a not related adult men. Viewing this new alimony arrangement since a contract involving the partner and you may brand new spouse, we impose the package by providing the term “cohabit” the ordinary and you may acknowledged definition. Ergo, we affirm.

The parties were separated for the July 21, 1981. Previous thereto, the fresh new husband and spouse first started transactions in regards to the assets office, alimony, and attorney’s charge. *1215 These types of deals culminated on execution out of a specified settlement. Pursuant to that agreement, this new partner conveyed specific personal and property to the partner, while sustaining particular individual assets to own himself. Simultaneously, he wanted to pay alimony with the wife toward a month-to-month basis for 2 yrs unless she died, remarried, or cohabited having an unrelated mature men. The expression “cohabit” was not discussed regarding the stipulation. The newest husband paid back alimony according to the terms of which arrangement until ily Courtroom trying cancel alimony payments because of the wife’s continuous cohabitation with an unrelated adult men. Continuarea →