Complainant says one to Respondent pulls users to the Domain names which have confusingly equivalent web addresses and you will websites. The brand new landing profiles of the Domain names are comparable, and you will purport to offer the same functions. Your website within

Domain name conspicuously screens the language “Such Seafood Relationship” and proclaims: “Sign up one of the recommended online dating website certainly other online dating sites and you will fulfill glamorous single men and women regarding any element of Industry.” In addition, the newest splash page will bring backlinks so you’re able to fighting dating other sites, and additionally “theseniordating”, “singlecougar”, and you can “filipinocupid”.

Domain name similarly displays the text “POF Totally free 100% Online Matchmaking”, and “Sign up For free 100% Free Single people Dating website”. As well, so it splash page alsoprovides hyperlinks so you’re able to contending matchmaking other sites, including the “filipinocupid” webpages.

Complainant states so it has not yet authorized Respondent to utilize people of your PLENTYOFFISH Marks, neither one draw confusingly similar thereto, since the good age. Towards advice and you may religion, Complainant shows that Respondent enjoys entered and continues to utilize the Domains so you can misguide profiles and you may potential users away from Complainant’s relationship functions, from the Complainant’s expenses as well as for Respondent’s money. Continuarea →