21. Creinin Meters D, Keverline S, Meyn L A. Exactly how typical is regular? An analysis from cycle frequency. Birth-control. 2004; 70 :289–292. [PubMed] kissbrides.com about his [Google Student]
twenty-two. Geirsson Roentgen T, Busby-Earle Roentgen Yards. Particular times will most likely not offer an established guess out of gestational decades. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991; 98 :108–109. [PubMed] [Google Pupil]
23. Waller D K, Spears W D, Gu Y. mais aussi al. Examining count-certain mistake regarding the remember from onset of last menstrual period. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; fourteen :262–267. [PubMed] [Google Beginner]
24. Haarburger D, Pillay T S. Historic point of views inside symptomatic logical pathology: growth of the fresh maternity decide to try. J Clin Pathol. 2011; 64 :546–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
twenty-six. Scolaro K l, Braxton-Lloyd K, Helms K-l. Devices to own home analysis out of women?s health issues. Was J Health Syst Pharm. 2008; 65 :299–314. [PubMed] [Bing Student]
twenty-seven. Johnson S-r, Godbert S, Perry P. et al. Precision from a house-situated equipment getting providing a young imagine of pregnancy years opposed with reference actions. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 :1635–1641. [PubMed] [Yahoo Pupil]
29. Mustafa G, David Roentgen Jparative accuracy of scientific imagine instead of monthly period gestational years for the computerized beginning certificates. Personal Health Associate. 2001; 116 :15–21. [PMC free blog post] [PubMed] [Bing Scholar]
29. Johnson S, Godbert Sparison from house maternity take to which have months estimator and ultrasound crown-rump dimension to assume delivery time. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 (3 Suppl.):S330. [Yahoo Beginner]