I’m questioning in the event that Cuckfield/ Lindfield/ Haywards Heath wasn’t the space she in fact grew up in, and maybe she just got hitched in Cuckfield (spouse of London area/ Middlesex) and had college students back to their unique domestic parish into the legitimacy having being married elsewhere- perhaps a parish with untranscribed records somewhere

P.S. Since the hook aside from the essential issue, I’m in addition to a little while puzzled about a marriage inside the 1829 however, upcoming first-known youngster are created 1836 (with many different youngsters at typical intervals afterwards). Any information invited please!

And so i assume you could say title is brand of so you’re able https://internationalwomen.net/tr/misirli-kadinlar/ to the County. Your wedding are :- 1829 Jan 5 Cuckfield Edward Phebe Early in the day bach otp & Sarah JUPP twist otp banns – no further details.

There are a great number of JUPPs married on Cuckfield. The IGI exposure is doesn’t exists towards several months you you want. I don’t know whether I would obtain it on Cd, I am able to research.

Thanks a lot Burt. As i started contrasting Jupp I was thinking it should be including an unusual name- bingo! I recently don’t know what direction to go from this point regardless if. An expensive solution is to order the Sussex Wedding Index and tally regarding Sarah Jupp baptisms in order to marriages (including burials), but here carry out be a large amount of conjecture on it and even then i may likely be left with lots of seemingly unsatisfying baptism selection. Definitely you can find likelihood of zero baptism and you will baptism not as much as an excellent different surname (illegitimacy, etc). But I feel for example I have use up all your practical (We.age. besides wishful thinking/ crazy conjecture) channels off look here until somebody gives me personally an alternate tip. Continuarea →