A: They truly are delivered over analysis. Texts are sent over just voice contours. Text messages could be converted across the voice contours. Multimedia messages, photos, videos, one thing of the nature wanted investigation so they aren’t capable go over a similar-a comparable trends.

Q: I suppose what I’m having a problem with is where is actually the online involved in the te[x]t messaging dialogue that you’re that have having [Duren]?

Q: And thus that has been the sole time that the websites are made use of so far as in the event that txt messaging started. Is the fact best.

T. an identical cellphone-phone number during their Snapsext speak

To your notice, Duren essentially asks that it legal so you can reweigh evidence on this part. I refuse to exercise. We really do not make an effort to weighing the evidence or pass on brand new dependability from witnesses; you to definitely obligation try left on the trier of-fact. Harris v. Condition, 331 Ark. 353, 355, 961 S.W.2d 737, 739 (1998). Correctly, we hold that there is actually good-sized research to support the latest jury’s finding that whenever Duren and you can “B.T.” traded photographs, the guy used the internet as required of the part 5–27–306(a). 4

We need to second consider if the several photos-usually the one out-of Duren holding his pal’s baby and the you to definitely out-of an effective prepubescent litttle lady (purportedly “B.T.”) carrying a loaded creature-delivered over the internet is adequate to match the relevant websites-stalking-of-a-kid law. Continuarea →