101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond self-report: Playing with latency to respond to model the question reacting procedure toward web-built public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to own Political Telecommunications Look , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Scholar

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you can Hibbing , John R. , “Political thinking vary with physiological attributes,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle College student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are women more likely to choose getting women’s affairs debts than just its men acquaintances?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Female Create: The policy Impression of women in Congress ( il : University regarding il Press , 2002 ).Yahoo Scholar

105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia An effective. , “Emblematic speeches throughout the You.S. Senate and their representational implications,” Record regarding Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Will be blacks depict blacks and you may feminine portray female? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Journal out of Government 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle College student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated governmental education as well as the detailed expression of women,” Governmental Behavior 2003 , twenty five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be a great ‘gender affinity effect’ within the American politics? S. Home elections,” Political Lookup Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle College student

This post could have been quoted by the following courses. This checklist is done considering research available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A great. and you will Crave, Ellen 2015. Is-it Gender, Religiosity otherwise Each other? A task Congruity Theory off Applicant Electability for the Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints towards the Politics, Vol. thirteen, Material. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. Whom stereotypes feminine people? Pinpointing private differences in feminine stereotype dependency. Government, Groups, and Identities, Vol. step three, Thing. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The brand new part out-of gender for the detailed signal,” Governmental Search Quarterly 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine assault. Government together with Lifestyle Sciences, Vol. 34, Procedure. 1, p. 44.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you will Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering combined indicators: brand new part out of gender and you will Kako upoznati lijepu Еѕenu partisanship during the analysis out of politicians. Diary regarding Elections, Public opinion and People, Vol. twenty-six, Thing. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you can Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Center and you will (No) Notice? Exactly how Readers Negatively Infer Destroyed Information about Politicians as well as how So it Impacts this new Evaluation of your Speakermunication Research, Vol. 43, Procedure. 7, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you may Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Choosing Perceptions out of Feminine Political figures: Possible out-of Poland. Politics in the Main Europe, Vol. fourteen, Matter. step three, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you can Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Societal Role Theory towards the Study of Gender inside the Politics. Governmental Mindset, Vol. forty, Topic. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunrays Young and Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence towards Female Political leaders: As to the reasons Ambivalence Things to possess Gender Equivalence when you look at the an effective Democracy. Log of females, Government & Plan, Vol. 40, Procedure. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Assassination and Women in Government. Corvinus Journal away from Internationally Things, Vol. cuatro, Situation. 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Management throughout the Mass media: Gender Bias when you look at the Frontrunner Stereotypes while in the Promotion and you will Techniques Minutes. British Diary off Political Research, Vol. fifty, Material. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Customers Evaluate Highway?Peak Bureaucrats’ Desire and you may Skills? An effective Typology and you may Try. Public Management Remark, Vol. 80, Material. cuatro, p. 532.