step 1. Yet, within the family history, we-all knowthat for every rule you will find a difference. An excellent vexing point ofgenealogy is that no-one most understands exactly how to make use of the conditions orrules which have any definitive adjective particularly constantly, perhaps, probably,almost certainly, an such like. It would be fascinating in the event the there most other instances ofjointures being produced annually or a couple after a well-known wedding time.

2. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation for the relationships out-of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, shortly after removed from the fresh fifth LordClifford? Who restrict their matrimony big date.

Arthur

Presumably, in the event the a beneficial dispensation try desired and you may provided, it could havebeen because of the one of many following the, that will are available in the fresh new correspondingregister book, if it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520

5. If for example the 10th Lord Clifford does get married during the early 1487 [say January] andhas E later on where season, does the brand new chronology perhaps not performs?

John arms?

E created during the late 1487, Henry created within the 1488/nine, Joan from inside the ,etc. completing the brands of the send regarding . When the (a) thechronology nevertheless really works; and (b) their own wedding piece wasn’t reduced; thenwe have only brand new 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s which is into the oppositionto the supposition you to definitely she is actually a valid child.

six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Would be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII connections omitted? Were there others? In this case,won’t one to echo poorly on this file because a source?

Off evaluations I have made from the new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, that are

On the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, this new Clifford children are not listedin an excellent Clifford pedigree, but rather about St. John pedigree. Due to the fact I’mnot familiar with the new St. John family members, following ‘s the suggestions asit appears on the c.1505 pedigree, as the obtained from the 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. article. The fresh new phrasing in quotations is strictly as it looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Out of my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset had about three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman this new King’s Mommy.” who had “The latest King.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she got step three daus & 2 sons:

A. “Edith, married in order to Geoffrey Pole out of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married to the Woman Margaret, dau. of theDuke off Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun out of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you may sistren.” That have issueindicated, not called.C2. “Age, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, wedded basic on kissbrides.com about his the Lord Zouche; shortly after on the LordScrope off Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated yet not entitled.

Margaret Duchess of Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “E.”