Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Via lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the line to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used in asylum applications. This article explores what is the due diligence data room just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to find the way these devices and to go after their right for protection.

It also displays how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from getting at the stations of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: even though they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.